Budget constraints, utility functions and maximized utility

This post goes over a question regarding the economics of utility functions and budget constraints:

Matt has the utility function U = √XY (where Y represents pears and X represents hamburgers), income of $20, and is deciding how to allocate that income between pears and hamburgers. Both hamburgers and pears cost $1.00 each. 

(i) Write the equation for Matt’s budget line in slope, intercept form (y = mx + c).

 (ii) Matt’s utility function implies that the marginal utility of pears is 0.5√X/Y and the marginal utility of hotdogs is 0.5√Y/X . How many pears will Matt buy? How many hamburgers will he buy?

 (iii) This year, the price of hamburgers rise to $3 each while Matt’s income is unchanged. Matt’s father decides to help him by giving him a gift of $20. Consider an indifference curve-budget line diagram with hamburgers on the x-axis and pears on the y-axis. After Matt gets the $20 gift, will his new budget line lie above, lie below, or pass through his initial optimum? Justify your choice. Will Matt be better or worse off than he was last year?

Ok, let's start with the information given to us:
Utility function is (XY)^0.5

The budget constraint is equal to M = PxX + PyY

Since the budget is equal to 20, and the price of each good is $1, we want the budget line to intercept each axis at a value of 20 (meaning 20 pears and 20 hamburgers).  To get this, our intercept has to be 20, and 20 times our coefficient value has to result in 0.  This gives us:

Y = 20 – 1*X (which gives us our budget line)

The marginal utility of hamburgers and pears is given to us, but we could also figure it out by taking the appropriate derivative (if you know calculus).  In this case we would want to take the derivative of the utility function with respect to either X or Y, and this would give us the marginal utility associated with that good.

One of the rules of utility maximization is that the marginal utility per dollar spent has to be equal (the other is that the entire budget is exhausted).  Since the price of both goods is one dollar, we don’t have to worry about the per dollar part and can simply equate the two marginal utilities (but I will include it in the first step anyways to show what I mean).

So, marginal utility per dollar spent on good X is (NOTE: the square root of X is equal to X^0.5, they mean the same thing):
MUx/Px = 0.5(Y/X)^0.5/Px = 0.5(Y/X)^0.5

And marginal utility per dollar spent on good Y is:
MUy/Py = 0.5(X/Y)^0.5/Py = 0.5(X/Y)^0.5

Now if we set these two equations equal to each other we get:
0.5(Y/X)^0.5 = 0.5(X/Y)^.05

Now we can multiply both sides by 2, and then square both sides to get:
Y/X = X/Y and we can multiply both sides by Y, and divide both sides by X then take the square root of both sides to get:

X = Y

This means that we should consume the same amount of X and Y, since we have $20 and the price of each good is $1, we should consume ten of each.

Now the price of hamburgers rises to $3, but his budget stays the same.  This will definitely make the consumer worse off.  But what happens if we increase the consumer’s budget by $20?  Then we will see a shift out of the budget line, and potentially the consumer could be better or worse off.  This is pretty easy to see if we construct both budget lines and make note of where the original consumption point existed.

The mathematical way to do this is to again set marginal utility per dollar spent equal, except now the price of one good has increased to three so we have to make a slight modification.  Now:

The marginal utility per dollar spent of X (hamburgers) is:
Mux/Px = 0.5(Y/X)^0.5/3

We set this equal to the marginal utility per dollar spent of Y to get:

0.5(Y/X)^0.5/3 = 0.5(X/Y)^.05/1 and we now multiply both sides by 6, then square both sides to get:

Y/X = 9X/Y again multiply both sides by X and Y then take the square root of both sides to get:

Y = 3X 

This simply means that for every hotdog we consume, we should consume 3 pears.  This makes sense because the price of hamburgers is 3 times the price of pears.  If our budget constraint is 40, and the price of pears is 1, and the price of hamburgers is 3, then we should still devote $20 each to hot dog and apple consumption except now $20 buys 20 pears, and $20 buys 6.667 hamburgers.  This is the utility maximizing choice.

Budget Constraint graph with changes in prices and income
The trick now is to plug these values into the utility function to see whether or not your utility is higher under the first or second scenario.  By consuming 10 of each good our utility is equal to (10*10)^0.5 which is equal to 10, while in the second scenario our utility is equal to (20*6)^0.5 which is about equal to 10.95 which is higher.  So we are willing to let the price of hamburgers triple if we can also double our budget, in fact we prefer it.  You can confirm this by looking at the graph to the right.

Spread the knowledge!
Technorati Digg This Stumble Stumble Facebook Twitter


Anonymous said...

Thanks again!

Irma E. Dean on September 24, 2017 at 8:26 PM said...

This is so hashing news and police should to investigate this accident. I feel so sad when I heard this type of news and become so gloomy but this http://www.essayheaven.org/ will make your task excellent. People should help in this case and the person who did this act has no heart.

Post a Comment


I invite you to join dropbox!

I invite you to join dropbox!
Use the above link for an extra 250MB Free!
All content on this site is the copyright of webmaster. No re-posting is permitted. Powered by Blogger.
VigLink badge

Post Archive

| FreeEconHelp.com, Learning Economics... Solved! © 2009. All Rights Reserved | Template Style by My Blogger Tricks .com | Design by Brian Gardner Back To Top